<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pixelhaven Web Design &#124; A Cincinnati Web Design Company &#187; ie6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/tag/ie6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelhavenllc.com</link>
	<description>Passionate about creating attractive, simple and structurally clean web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Death to Internet Explorer 6?</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/death-to-internet-explorer-6</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/death-to-internet-explorer-6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Harbaugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a perfect world could you neglect outdated Internet Explorer versions? Of course. However, the reality is enough users still use the outdated browsers that just completely neglecting them would mean cutting a percentage of traffic that you may not be able to afford to lose.</p><p><a href="http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/death-to-internet-explorer-6">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some web standards aficionados preach excluding Internet Explorer 6 <a href="http://simplebits.com/notebook/2009/02/13/iegone.html" target="_blank">citing that</a>, &#8220;there are plenty of sites I&#8217;ve designed and maintain where the IE6 stats are low enough to drop the axe and move on.&#8221; That&#8217;s great for them, but it seems most of the websites these gurus are designing are geared toward&#8230; me, an above average Internet User (no horn-tooting intended) that hasn&#8217;t used IE6 since ever.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never used IE6 for anything other than &#8220;making sure something looks OK in it.&#8221; Therein lies my point. It&#8217;s fine to state &#8220;<a href="http://iedeathmarch.org/" target="_blank">Death to IE6</a>&#8221; and I fully <em>support</em> not supporting Internet Explorer 6, but that&#8217;s not a realistic option for most of the web designers out there. Myself included. When was the last time someone said, &#8220;You know, I don&#8217;t really care if my website looks different in other browsers.&#8221; It&#8217;s never happened to me. Never. And it probably never will, because website owners do not want to risk ostracizing their users. Who can blame them?</p>
<p>Are there alternatives that you can use to ensures that your IE6 users, no matter how few or many, will get a similar experience as the rest of your more standards-based browser users? Yes. Web designers have figured out plenty of options to serve up style sheets for Internet Explorer versions that are less standards-capable. I prefer the <a href="http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/weblog/quick-tip-using-conditional-comments-and-css/" target="_self">conditional comments</a> solution.</p>
<p>In a perfect world could you neglect outdated Internet Explorer versions? Of course. However, the reality is enough users still use the outdated browsers that just completely neglecting them would mean cutting a percentage of traffic that you may not be able to afford to lose. Can you serve up a stripped down version for outdated browsers? Sure. If your website will still function properly for those users, you should not be afraid to give them a simpler design with less &#8216;bells and whistles&#8217; in place. If the design and site still look and function how they&#8217;d expect then they will never know they are missing out <a href="http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/weblog/quick-tip-using-conditional-comments-and-css/#conditionalcomments" target="_self">unless you tell them</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelhavenllc.com/death-to-internet-explorer-6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

